Silverado EV Forum banner

Chevy upgrades Silverado EV WT to 450 miles of range

1413 Views 14 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  supchrgamx
Wheel Tire Car Vehicle Sky


Chevy has announced that the Silverado EV WT's range has been increased to 450 miles.


GM announced that the Chevrolet Silverado EV WT electric pickup will have 450 miles of range on a single charge – significantly higher than expected.

It is still planned for this spring.

While GM is a bit late on its rival Ford in the pickup market with an electric option, it might be worth the wait.

When the automaker first announced the Silverado EV last year, GM said that it estimated the top range to be about 400 miles for Silverado EV Work Truck (WT), which is going to be the first version available and for fleets.

Today, GM updated the Silverado EV Work Truck’s range with an EPA-estimated range of 450 miles:

Chevrolet has some electrifyingly good news to share today! The Silverado EV Work Truck’s EPA-estimated range is in: 450 miles on a full charge. With this official estimate, the Silverado EV WT is expected to offer over 100 miles more than its closest on-sale competitor.
It’s indeed much more than the Ford Lightning’s 320 miles of range with an Extended Battery pack and 328 miles for the Rivian R1T with the highest range configuration.

GM commented on the higher than expected range:

Our engineering team long targeted at least 400 miles of range, but they were able to go above and beyond to achieve this increase. Over the past several months, extensive development and testing unlocked the increased 450-mile range. This figure, paired with the ability to charge at 350 kW, makes the Silverado EV WT the choice electric pickup to serve fleet buyers’ needs. After all, this truck wears a Silverado badge – it’s made for tough jobs.
The automaker also added that while the 450-mile version will be the first available, the Silverado EV WT will also have a smaller battery pack option with a “GM-estimated 350 miles of range on a full charge” that will come “soon after launch.”

In the release about the range increase, GM claims to still be “on track to launch in the spring of 2023.”

The first edition is expected to feature 510 horsepower, 615 lb-ft of torque, 1,200 lb. of payload capacity, and 8,000 lb. of towing capacity. That towing capacity is a bit limited, but GM says that a Max Towing Package will upgrade the capacity to up to 20,000 lb. in 2025.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Wonder if it’s because of less power than the high end model = more range.
As I’ve been saying, and got scoffed at on this forum for it. No surprise, I was expecting actual to be at least 425 and probably more like upwards of 450 would not be an unreasonable pleasant suprise. Why? GM is an engineering company these days, and being an engineer we like to underpromise and find a way to over deliver. Also 400 gives you a nice round low spec until you can comfortably prove you can do more, and since it was already more than the competitors why pad the number? Finally historically GM likes to underspec it’s EV numbers, the Bolt easily gets longer range than it’s speced for.

Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
The 3500HD EV has been rumored going to have the Allison motors with gearboxs for increased towing range.
As I’ve been saying, and got scoffed at on this forum for it. No surprise, I was expecting actual to be at least 425 and probably more like upwards of 450 would not be an unreasonable pleasant suprise. Why? GM is an engineering company these days, and being an engineer we like to underpromise and find a way to over deliver. Also 400 gives you a nice round low spec until you can comfortably prove you can do more, and since it was already more than the competitors why pad the number? Finally historically GM likes to underspec it’s EV numbers, the Bolt easily gets longer range than it’s speced for.

Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
Cause you were drinking the coolaide and still are, it was in the same post you said the frunk was going to be redesigned to be larger than fords. Right now all GM and Chrysler have is marketing claims. Still not going to tow an RV 300 miles at highway speeds. It’s a pleasant surprise announcement, but we still need to quantify it with real world stats as GM seems to be more of a marketing company then anything right now, especially with the EVs.
yet when GM Vehicles get tested in the real world, they are one of the few that are always close or better than their EPA numbers.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
We won't know for sure until it is tested, but Stellantis (RAM) is reaching for range by stuffing a bigger(huge) battery. The 500mi version of the RAM is estimated to be 229 KwH compared to 212 KwH for the Silverado EV.

GM= 212 KwH->450mi range = 2.13 mi/KwH
Ford= 131 KwH ->320mi range = 2.44 mi/KwH
RAM= 229 KwH -> 500mi range = 2.18mi/KwH

The 2025 all-electric Ram 1500 Rev has an absolutely massive battery | TechCrunch

So its in the right ballpark, although as I've seen with my Lightning, highway range will probably be around 2mi/KwH or 440-460mi range.
  • Helpful
Reactions: 1
As I’ve been saying, and got scoffed at on this forum for it. No surprise, I was expecting actual to be at least 425 and probably more like upwards of 450 would not be an unreasonable pleasant suprise. Why? GM is an engineering company these days, and being an engineer we like to underpromise and find a way to over deliver. Also 400 gives you a nice round low spec until you can comfortably prove you can do more, and since it was already more than the competitors why pad the number? Finally historically GM likes to underspec it’s EV numbers, the Bolt easily gets longer range than it’s speced for.

Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
If these guys are going to use range extenders, which isn't out of the realm of possibility, why not use a small turbine? Wouldn't it be more efficient?
3
My wife and her GFs rented a Taycan ( it's a Porsche EV) and cruised Switzerland, Germany and France. They noticed quite often the EV charging stops had pull thru spots for EV's towing trailers. People in Europe tow anything with anything. It's crazy.

As those pull thru EV station appear in the US and Canada and become adequate, a vehicles range towing won't be an issue. Especially when EV truck owners enjoy insane, colossal towing power without all the emissions issues and other mulligans.

We just Lemon Lawed a 2001 DMAX truck because of crazy emission issues, as have my Ford and other Dmax owning friends. I'm done with ICE as soon as I can get something in EV to do the same job.

I'll throw a generator in the bed if I have to. I'm spent, I've had enough.

Travel stops along the I 10, I 80, I 40 and other major highways across + up and down the USA are buying up acreage around them to accommodate this new era.

EV trucks aren't for everyone - yet. For now the argument stops there.



Baker Cali:


Germany:
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
If these guys are going to use range extenders, which isn't out of the realm of possibility, why not use a small turbine? Wouldn't it be more efficient?
Or even some of these Free-Piston generators that run on propane, hydrogen, diesel, moonshine, etc
Mercedes-Benz EQXX completes 1,000-km drive on a charge | Autoblog - Autoblog
Used 8.7 kWh per 100 km
Used 8.7 kWh per 62 miles
7 miles per kw
there is a lot of nuance here... average speed, weight of vehicle, and coeffects of drag of the vehicle. It isn't all battery.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
there is a lot of nuance here... average speed, weight of vehicle, and coeffects of drag of the vehicle. It isn't all battery.
l agree
just wanted to throw it out there
the truck is heavy and like pushing a 4x8 sheet of plywood on the front, getting 725 km seems pretty good to me
how the manufactures are keeping up with battery tech,
im sure they are having long discussion in the board room
now im hearing solid state batteries, next year
semi solid state now
silicon batteries
its like being at the arcade with all the manufactures lined up with their water pistol trying to pop their balloon first
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top