Wonder if it’s because of less power than the high end model = more range.
It’s indeed much more than the Ford Lightning’s 320 miles of range with an Extended Battery pack and 328 miles for the Rivian R1T with the highest range configuration.Chevrolet has some electrifyingly good news to share today! The Silverado EV Work Truck’s EPA-estimated range is in: 450 miles on a full charge. With this official estimate, the Silverado EV WT is expected to offer over 100 miles more than its closest on-sale competitor.
The automaker also added that while the 450-mile version will be the first available, the Silverado EV WT will also have a smaller battery pack option with a “GM-estimated 350 miles of range on a full charge” that will come “soon after launch.”Our engineering team long targeted at least 400 miles of range, but they were able to go above and beyond to achieve this increase. Over the past several months, extensive development and testing unlocked the increased 450-mile range. This figure, paired with the ability to charge at 350 kW, makes the Silverado EV WT the choice electric pickup to serve fleet buyers’ needs. After all, this truck wears a Silverado badge – it’s made for tough jobs.
Cause you were drinking the coolaide and still are, it was in the same post you said the frunk was going to be redesigned to be larger than fords. Right now all GM and Chrysler have is marketing claims. Still not going to tow an RV 300 miles at highway speeds. It’s a pleasant surprise announcement, but we still need to quantify it with real world stats as GM seems to be more of a marketing company then anything right now, especially with the EVs.As I’ve been saying, and got scoffed at on this forum for it. No surprise, I was expecting actual to be at least 425 and probably more like upwards of 450 would not be an unreasonable pleasant suprise. Why? GM is an engineering company these days, and being an engineer we like to underpromise and find a way to over deliver. Also 400 gives you a nice round low spec until you can comfortably prove you can do more, and since it was already more than the competitors why pad the number? Finally historically GM likes to underspec it’s EV numbers, the Bolt easily gets longer range than it’s speced for.
Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
yet when GM Vehicles get tested in the real world, they are one of the few that are always close or better than their EPA numbers.
We won't know for sure until it is tested, but Stellantis (RAM) is reaching for range by stuffing a bigger(huge) battery. The 500mi version of the RAM is estimated to be 229 KwH compared to 212 KwH for the Silverado EV.Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
If these guys are going to use range extenders, which isn't out of the realm of possibility, why not use a small turbine? Wouldn't it be more efficient?As I’ve been saying, and got scoffed at on this forum for it. No surprise, I was expecting actual to be at least 425 and probably more like upwards of 450 would not be an unreasonable pleasant suprise. Why? GM is an engineering company these days, and being an engineer we like to underpromise and find a way to over deliver. Also 400 gives you a nice round low spec until you can comfortably prove you can do more, and since it was already more than the competitors why pad the number? Finally historically GM likes to underspec it’s EV numbers, the Bolt easily gets longer range than it’s speced for.
Compare this to Stellantis who got caught with their pants down and now are promising the moon, yet as far as we know they’re just getting into EV‘s seriously for the first time. Will they pull off 500+ in a year or two? Doubtful, they’re designing that truck with today’s batteries and I doubt they’ll get those kinds of numbers without some stupid trick like an ICE range extender.
Or even some of these Free-Piston generators that run on propane, hydrogen, diesel, moonshine, etcIf these guys are going to use range extenders, which isn't out of the realm of possibility, why not use a small turbine? Wouldn't it be more efficient?
there is a lot of nuance here... average speed, weight of vehicle, and coeffects of drag of the vehicle. It isn't all battery.Mercedes-Benz EQXX completes 1,000-km drive on a charge | Autoblog - Autoblog
Used 8.7 kWh per 100 km
Used 8.7 kWh per 62 miles
7 miles per kw
l agreethere is a lot of nuance here... average speed, weight of vehicle, and coeffects of drag of the vehicle. It isn't all battery.